The topic for today is visual acuity. A reader/member was in contact with someone who read one of my posts in another forum. That someone wanted to know what my visual acuity is that I could still ride my bike. The answer to that was “I don’t know. Let me get back to you.”
Why don’t I know? My vision is measured monthly when I go for the clinical trial. They are tracking it. I am not. Frankly, watching the numbers worsen would be too depressing and anxiety-provoking.
Ignorance can be bliss and I would rather concentrate on my abilities rather than my disabilities. No use rubbing my nose in it every month.
Also, while, yes, my vision keeps getting worse, the measurements fluctuate a bit. Some days I am “on”. Either I am able to hold the letters in my sweet spot for an extra half second or I am guessing well. Some days I am “off”. Visual acuity is a psychophysiological process and some days the “psycho” part takes more of the load than others.
So, that said, my visual acuity in my better eye is 71 and in my worse eye it is 52. Huh? Not the usual scores we see. That is because those are letter counts or simply visual acuity scores. Letter counts are used in research.
As I pointed out in a page on why I did not get into the stem cell study, my score reflected a moderate loss. My good eye is at the top of the range and my bad eye is at the bottom of the range. How I know this is I found a nifty little chart entitled Visual Acuity Ranges and Visual Acuity Notations published by Precision-Vision.com.
This chart compares several different ways to measure visual acuity. One is, of course, the Snellen chart. In the States that notation is 20/ xxx. The 20 is 20 feet and the xxx is the distance related to your acuity scores. Using my chart, my good eye is between 20/63 and 20/80 meaning I see at 20 feet what “good” eyes see at 63 feet. My bad eye has an acuity score between 20/160 and 20/200.
There is the decimal scale included on the chart as well. If you have been perplexed when somebody said her vision was 0.4 for example, the translation to Snellen is 20/50. According to Michael Bach and his Visual Acuity Cheatsheet, decimal acuity and Snellen numbers are identical. All you have to do is calculate the fraction. In other words, for my worse eye I have a Snellen score of 20/ 160. 20 divided by 160 is 0.125.
Looks to me like they just wanted to confuse the issue, but what do I know? Well, for one thing, I know the definition of MAR sounds very confusing to someone who is not a hard science person. Damien Gatineau gives the definition of minimal angle of resolution (MAR) as “the visual angle that must under tender two point sources to be resolved on the retina.” Alrightee then. In layman’s terms it sounds as if it means something like how much “space” has to be between two points for the person to see them as two separate points. Interesting but I don’t think we need to worry about those. They are also generally expressed as decimals.
So that is what I have learned about acuity measures. In my case 20/63 and 20/200 still leave “room” for my doing many things, including riding my bike. Maybe in your case, too?
Written August 14,2019